<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wordpress 2.5.x Design Issues: Why I am staying with my 2.3.3 &#8220;Renegade&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://businessmindhacks.com/post/wordpress-25x-design-issues-why-i-am-staying-with-my-233-renegade/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://businessmindhacks.com/post/wordpress-25x-design-issues-why-i-am-staying-with-my-233-renegade</link>
	<description>Thinking about your business on another level.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 02:18:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://businessmindhacks.com/post/wordpress-25x-design-issues-why-i-am-staying-with-my-233-renegade/comment-page-1#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessmindhacks.com/post/wordpress-25x-design-issues-why-i-am-staying-with-my-233-renegade#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>New is not always good...Vista has obviously proven that. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yes, I think it&#039;s best to stick to 2.3.3 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New is not always good&#8230;Vista has obviously proven that. </p>
<p>Yes, I think it&#8217;s best to stick to 2.3.3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wqc</title>
		<link>http://businessmindhacks.com/post/wordpress-25x-design-issues-why-i-am-staying-with-my-233-renegade/comment-page-1#comment-2158</link>
		<dc:creator>wqc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 22:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessmindhacks.com/post/wordpress-25x-design-issues-why-i-am-staying-with-my-233-renegade#comment-2158</guid>
		<description>In reply to @&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1978&quot;&gt;Matthew Hill&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br/&gt;e </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to @<a href="#comment-1978">Matthew Hill</a>:<br />e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent Faves Tagged With "wysiwig" : MyNetFaves</title>
		<link>http://businessmindhacks.com/post/wordpress-25x-design-issues-why-i-am-staying-with-my-233-renegade/comment-page-1#comment-2157</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Faves Tagged With "wysiwig" : MyNetFaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessmindhacks.com/post/wordpress-25x-design-issues-why-i-am-staying-with-my-233-renegade#comment-2157</guid>
		<description>[...] public links &gt;&gt; wysiwig    Wordpress 2.5.x Design Issues: Why I am staying with my 2.3.3 ... First saved by e55fair &#124; 0 days ago      Bikin Blog Di Google site First saved by ksskruthic &#124; 6 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] public links &gt;&gt; wysiwig    Wordpress 2.5.x Design Issues: Why I am staying with my 2.3.3 &#8230; First saved by e55fair | 0 days ago      Bikin Blog Di Google site First saved by ksskruthic | 6 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://businessmindhacks.com/post/wordpress-25x-design-issues-why-i-am-staying-with-my-233-renegade/comment-page-1#comment-1980</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessmindhacks.com/post/wordpress-25x-design-issues-why-i-am-staying-with-my-233-renegade#comment-1980</guid>
		<description>In reply to @&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1978&quot;&gt;Matthew Hill&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br/&gt;Hey Matthew, thanks for your detailed reply and the excellent links, those discussions are very telling indeed.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;One would have hoped that the Happy Cog design firm that &quot;helped&quot; in the 2.5.x admin redesign effort would have had a bit more sense, especially regarding the screen real estate.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think in cases like this the problem is that these designers did not see themselves in the role of a  longer-term user, likely because they themselves were not involved with blogging, or at least blogging using Wordpress.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have actually used our little discussion over at Andrew Boyd&#039;s ( &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://onblogging.com.au/2008/04/26/b-is-for-blogging-platform/#comment-3728&quot;&gt;*link*&lt;/a&gt; ) as a reason to revisit my design for the App Engine, which could then be the base for a truly industrial-strength blogging platform. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to @<a href="#comment-1978">Matthew Hill</a>:<br />Hey Matthew, thanks for your detailed reply and the excellent links, those discussions are very telling indeed.</p>
<p>One would have hoped that the Happy Cog design firm that &#8220;helped&#8221; in the 2.5.x admin redesign effort would have had a bit more sense, especially regarding the screen real estate.</p>
<p>I think in cases like this the problem is that these designers did not see themselves in the role of a  longer-term user, likely because they themselves were not involved with blogging, or at least blogging using Wordpress.</p>
<p>I have actually used our little discussion over at Andrew Boyd&#8217;s ( <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://onblogging.com.au/2008/04/26/b-is-for-blogging-platform/#comment-3728">*link*</a> ) as a reason to revisit my design for the App Engine, which could then be the base for a truly industrial-strength blogging platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Hill</title>
		<link>http://businessmindhacks.com/post/wordpress-25x-design-issues-why-i-am-staying-with-my-233-renegade/comment-page-1#comment-1978</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessmindhacks.com/post/wordpress-25x-design-issues-why-i-am-staying-with-my-233-renegade#comment-1978</guid>
		<description>An excellent post and I had something very similar in mind during the first few days of the 2.5 release. But the more I used it, the more I got exasperated to the point that any objective review would have been impossible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I won&#039;t go into detailed responses to all your points as it will make my reply way too long. But in regard to #1 and #2 you might like to view the thread where I asked Liz Danzico (Happy Cog Information Archtect) the reasoning behind changes to 2.5:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://bobulate.com/2008/03/31/wordpress-on-the-street/&quot;&gt;*link*&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding #5 -- which broadly speaking is about transparency and open-ness: It seems very hard to get anyone at Wordpress to take constructive criticism seriously. A thread on On Blogging Australia highlights the problem -- check out the comments, in particular the discussion between myself (Matthew Hill), Andrew Boyd and Mr.Mullenweg:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://onblogging.com.au/2008/04/26/b-is-for-blogging-platform/&quot;&gt;*link*&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s so much more I could say, but basically I concur with your criticisms outlined above. For me and many others, 2.5 was truly a turkey and unfortunately it has not improved with 2.6. Sure, more features have been added, but stuff that&#039;s important to me (stability, usability and accessibility issues for example) still haven&#039;t been fixed, despite assurances to the contrary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sadly, I have no faith in Wordpress any more which is a real shame as it started out as such a wonderful system. I still use it on my blog because of the time investment I&#039;ve spent on it, but certainly in the future when I have more time to investigate other options, I&#039;ll be switching to something else entirely. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent post and I had something very similar in mind during the first few days of the 2.5 release. But the more I used it, the more I got exasperated to the point that any objective review would have been impossible.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t go into detailed responses to all your points as it will make my reply way too long. But in regard to #1 and #2 you might like to view the thread where I asked Liz Danzico (Happy Cog Information Archtect) the reasoning behind changes to 2.5:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://bobulate.com/2008/03/31/wordpress-on-the-street/">*link*</a></p>
<p>Regarding #5 &#8212; which broadly speaking is about transparency and open-ness: It seems very hard to get anyone at Wordpress to take constructive criticism seriously. A thread on On Blogging Australia highlights the problem &#8212; check out the comments, in particular the discussion between myself (Matthew Hill), Andrew Boyd and Mr.Mullenweg:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://onblogging.com.au/2008/04/26/b-is-for-blogging-platform/">*link*</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s so much more I could say, but basically I concur with your criticisms outlined above. For me and many others, 2.5 was truly a turkey and unfortunately it has not improved with 2.6. Sure, more features have been added, but stuff that&#8217;s important to me (stability, usability and accessibility issues for example) still haven&#8217;t been fixed, despite assurances to the contrary.</p>
<p>Sadly, I have no faith in Wordpress any more which is a real shame as it started out as such a wonderful system. I still use it on my blog because of the time investment I&#8217;ve spent on it, but certainly in the future when I have more time to investigate other options, I&#8217;ll be switching to something else entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

